Rodgers (Craig) Vs. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided September 30, 2021·No. 83517·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CRAIG ALLEN RODGERS, No. 83517 Appellant,

vs.

WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, WARDEN; STEVEN B. WOLFSON, DISTRICT FILED

ATTORNEY; AND THE STATE OF SEP 3 0 2021 NEVADA,

ri A. BROWN

Respondents. 'UFREBIE. COURT

Dr- TY CLER

--I --

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court "ORDER denying and/or dismissing the rule 60(B) motion ruled on the 26th day of August, 2021." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Susan Johnson, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order in a criminal matter, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Parraguirre

4,4(10iisat.i2 J. , J.

Stiglich Silver

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

1V47A cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Craig Allen Rodgers Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

40) 1947A Alett. 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodgers (Craig) Vs. Warden, (Neb. 2021).

Rodgers (Craig) Vs. Warden (Rodgers (Craig) Vs. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)