Rodgers (Craig) Vs. Warden

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided December 3, 2020·No. 82108·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CRAIG ALLEN RODGERS, No. 82108 Appellant,

vs.

WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, WARDEN; FILE STEVEN B. WOLFSON, DISTRICT ATTORNEY; AND THE STATE OF DEC 0 3 2020 NEVADA, EUZABETH A. GROWN Respondents. CLERK OF SUPREME COURT SY S

DEPUTY CL1A-

RK,

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and request for evidentiary hearing. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Susan Johnson, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from an order denying a motion for appointment of counsel and request for evidentiary hearing, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo u. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court

ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

ParraguirrnT

4.-ket_A gEtt.42\ j.

Hardesty Cadish

SUPREME COURT OF P1EVADA

0-'437 73

(01 IV47A

Wig& A.

cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Craig Allen Rodgers Attorney General/Carson City Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(01 1)47À ciejto 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodgers (Craig) Vs. Warden, (Neb. 2020).

Rodgers (Craig) Vs. Warden (Rodgers (Craig) Vs. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)