Rodgers (Craig) Vs. State

469 P.3d 187
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 14, 2020
Docket81533
StatusPublished

This text of 469 P.3d 187 (Rodgers (Craig) Vs. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodgers (Craig) Vs. State, 469 P.3d 187 (Neb. 2020).

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

CRAIG ALLEN RODGERS, No. 81533 Appellant, vs. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent. AUG 1 4 020 ELIZABETH BROWN EME •

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a motion for transcripts at state expense. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Susan Johnson, Judge. Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order, this court lacks jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, this court ORDERS this appeal DISMISSED.

Al4G4-.0 , J. Stiglich Silver

Z-0 - cc: Hon. Susan Johnson, District Judge Craig Allen Rodgers Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) I947A 2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Castillo v. State
792 P.2d 1133 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
469 P.3d 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodgers-craig-vs-state-nev-2020.