Rodger Pierce v. Bill Hanson
This text of Rodger Pierce v. Bill Hanson (Rodger Pierce v. Bill Hanson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-21-00301-CV
Rodger Pierce, Appellant
v.
Bill Hanson, Appellee
FROM THE 335TH DISTRICT COURT OF BASTROP COUNTY NO. 1191-335, THE HONORABLE REVA TOWSLEE-CORBETT, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant’s brief was originally due on August 5, 2021. On August 31, 2021, this
Court sent a notice to appellant informing him that his brief was overdue and that a failure to file
a satisfactory response by September 10, 2021, would result in the dismissal of this appeal for
want of prosecution. To date, appellant has not filed a brief or a motion for extension of time.
Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b).
__________________________________________ Melissa Goodwin, Justice
Before Justices Goodwin, Baker, and Smith
Dismissed for Want of Prosecution
Filed: November 16, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodger Pierce v. Bill Hanson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodger-pierce-v-bill-hanson-texapp-2021.