Rodger D. Robb v. Michael O'Keefe

Eighth Circuit

Rodger D. Robb v. Michael O'Keefe

84 F. App'x 725

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 6, 2004

Docket03-1585

StatusUnpublished

This text of 84 F. App'x 725 (Rodger D. Robb v. Michael O'Keefe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rodger D. Robb v. Michael O'Keefe, 84 F. App'x 725 (8th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Rodger Dean Robb appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his commitment under Minnesota’s Sexually Dangerous Person (SDP) Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 253B.02, subd. 18c, 253B.185 (2002). The district court granted Robb a certificate of appealability on whether Minnesota’s “lack of adequate control” standard comports with constitutional requirements. The constitutionality of Minnesota’s SDP Act was recently upheld in Linehan v. Milczark, 315 F.3d 920, 927-28 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellee’s pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Rodger Dean Robb appeals the district court’s 1 order denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition challenging his commitment under Minnesota’s Sexually Dangerous Person (SDP) Act, Minn.Stat. §§ 253B.02, subd. 18c, 253B.185 (2002). The district court granted Robb a certificate of appealability on whether Minnesota’s “lack of adequate control” standard comports with constitutional requirements. The constitutionality of Minnesota’s SDP Act was recently upheld in Linehan v. Milczark, 315 F.3d 920, 927-28 (8th Cir. 2003). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We deny appellee’s pending motion.

1

. The Honorable Paul A. Magnuson, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Jonathan G. Lebedoff, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

84 F. App'x 725, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodger-d-robb-v-michael-okeefe-ca8-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack