Rodford v. Craig
9 U.S. 289, 3 L. Ed. 104, 5 Cranch 289, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 455
Opinion
NO appearance having been entered on the docket for .either party in this cause, no counsel appearing, the court ordered both parties tó be called, and neither of them appearing, the court ordered the writ r ■ , „ i■.r • S of error to be dismissed.
The same order was made in the cases of Banks v. Bastrop, Tompkins v. Tompkins, and Buchannan v. Yeates.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodford v. Craig, 9 U.S. 289, 3 L. Ed. 104, 5 Cranch 289, 1809 U.S. LEXIS 455 (1809).
9 U.S. 289 (Rodford v. Craig) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harrison v. Sterry
9 U.S. 289 (Supreme Court, 1809)