Rodeway Inn v. Bryant
615 So. 2d 857, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339, 1993 WL 77416
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 22, 1993·No. No. 92-650·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
We affirm the award of wage-loss benefits in the instant case; however, we strike that portion of the order awarding wage loss “to the present and continuing” and substitute therefor the following: “to the date of the hearing and so long as such benefits are proper.” Workman v. McDonnell Douglas Corp., 590 So.2d 1035 (Fla.App. 1st DCA 1991); Wiley Jackson Co. v. Webster, 522 So.2d 987 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Veterans Septic Tank Serv. v. Wallace, 445 So.2d 389 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984).
AFFIRMED as modified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodeway Inn v. Bryant, 615 So. 2d 857, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 3339, 1993 WL 77416 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).
615 So. 2d 857 (Rodeway Inn v. Bryant) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matthew Marraffino v. Stericycle/Sedgwick CMS
260 So. 3d 1115 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. McDonald
620 So. 2d 1146 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)