Roderick Jordan v. State
This text of Roderick Jordan v. State (Roderick Jordan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ACCEPTED 07-14-00440-CR SEVENTH COURT OF APPEALS AMARILLO, TEXAS 4/21/2015 4:09:16 PM Vivian Long, Clerk
No. 07-14-00440-CR
FILED IN 7th COURT OF APPEALS RODERICK JORDAN § IN THE SEVENTH AMARILLO, TEXAS 4/21/2015 4:09:16 PM V. § COURT OF APPEALS VIVIAN LONG CLERK THE STATE OF TEXAS § AT AMARILLO, TEXAS
SECOND MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO FILE APPELLANT’S BRIEF
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGES OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW Roderick Jordan, Appellant in this cause, by and through
his duly appointed attorney on appeal, and requests that this Court further extend
the time in which to file Appellant’s Brief.
I.
Appellant was convicted of murder and sentenced to twenty (20) years’
imprisonment.
II.
The due date for Appellant’s Brief, set on one extension, is April 22, 2015.
The case is not yet set for submission.
III.
The undersigned attorney recognizes that, in its notice granting the previous
extension of time, the clerk advised that the Court “does not grant requests for subsequent extensions absent good cause. The Court does not generally consider
the normal press of business good cause. “
IV.
Appellant submits that good cause exists for this requested extension.
Appellant relies on the following facts to explain why the brief has not yet been
prepared and the need for a further extension of time in which to file the brief:
(1) The undersigned attorney’s work schedule, both on this case and on other
matters, was disrupted by long standing vacation plans with non-refundable
expenses from March 26 through March 30, 2015. Additionally, the undersigned
attorney was out of her office for significant periods of time on April 7 and April
20, 2015, to handle medical appointments and on April 16, 2015, to handle
personal matters which could not be attended to on a weekend. The undersigned
attorney’s spouse is scheduled for surgery on April 22 and April 29, 2015, which
will necessitate additional time out of the office.
(2) The undersigned attorney presented oral argument in Mark McCay v. The
State of Texas, No. 05-12-01199-CR, in the Fifth Court of Appeals on April 15,
2015. The McCay record is in excess of 2000 pages and the case presents three
issues of first impression regarding the indictment. All other legal work was
suspended on April 7, 2015 and not resumed until April 17, 2015, so that the
undersigned attorney could fully prepare for this unique oral argument. Indeed,
2 while the undersigned attorney usually requires 10-12 hours to fully prepare for
oral argument on any given case, approximately 38 attorney hours were expended
in oral argument preparation on McCay.
(3) Prior to beginning work on this case, the undersigned attorney must
complete and file a brief in Demuntra Rashard Green v. The State of Texas, No:
05-14-01264-CR. Work on the Green brief began on April 2, 2015, and
approximately 18 attorney hours have been expended on that case as of the date
and time of this motion. The record, which is in excess of 400 pages, has been read
in its entirety and four points of error are currently being researched. As noted in
the preceding paragraph, however, work on that case was suspended on April 7,
2015, to prepare for the McCay argument. The undersigned attorney hopes to have
the Green brief completed and filed within the next 5-8 business days.
(4) Additionally, since March 13, 2015, the undersigned attorney has
expended approximately 50 hours working on a brief in Terry Ray McMillan v.
The State of Texas, No: 05-14-01419-CR. The record in the McMillan case is
extensive, consisting of over 1300 pages. The case is currently on an abatement
due to missing/destroyed exhibits. The trial court entered Findings this morning on
the McMillan case and the undersigned attorney expects the abatement to be
dissolved and the brief ordered filed within the next few weeks.
3 (5) Lastly, the undersigned attorney is an adjunct professor at Texas A&M
School of Law teaching a rigorous writing seminar this spring. Students turned in
the first drafts of their seminar papers on March 31, 2015; the undersigned attorney
returned fully critiqued papers to the students on April 14, 2015, so that the
students would have a full two weeks to correct their work before submitting their
final papers for final grades on April 28, 2015. Reading and critiquing the seminar
papers consumed approximately 30 hours of the undersigned attorney’s time over
the course of nights and weekends from April 1 through April 13, 2015. Those
hours on nights and weekends would otherwise have been devoted to brief
preparation in the undersigned attorney’s pending cases.
(6) The brief in the case at bar is essentially “next” on the undersigned
attorney’s docket and will be started just as soon as the Green and McMillan briefs
are completed and filed. If the Fifth Court of Appeals affords significant additional
briefing time on the McMillan case, the undersigned attorney will brief this case
before completing the brief in McMillan.
V.
This Motion is not brought for purposes of delay but so that the lengthy
appellate record in this case can be read and evaluated, and so that the legal and
factual issues presented by the appellate record can be properly briefed and
presented to this Court on Appellant’s behalf.
4 WHEREFORE, Appellant requests that this Court extend Appellant’s
deadline to file his brief to May 22, 2015. If the undersigned attorney can file the
brief sooner, she will do so.
Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Katherine A. Drew Lynn Pride Richardson Katherine A. Drew Chief Public Defender Assistant Public Defender Dallas County, Texas State Bar No. 06117800 Frank Crowley Courts Building 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., LB-2 Dallas, Texas 75207-4399 (214) 875-2360 (phone) (214) 875-2363 (fax) Kathi.Drew@dallascounty.org
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that a true copy of the foregoing motion was served on the Dallas County Criminal District Attorney’s Office (Appellate Section), 133 N. Riverfront Blvd., B-19, 10th Floor, Dallas, Texas, 75207, by both electronic transmission and by hand delivery on April 21, 2015.
/s/ Katherine A. Drew Katherine A. Drew
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Roderick Jordan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roderick-jordan-v-state-tex-2015.