Roderick Carter v. CPC Logistics, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roderick Carter v. CPC Logistics, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 706 F. App'x 794
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 31, 2016·No. 15-2291·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 15-2291

RODERICK A. CARTER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

CPC LOGISTICS, INC.; CPC MEDICAL PRODUCTS, LLC; HOSPIRA FLEET SERVICES, LLC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Margaret B. Seymour, Senior District Judge. (3:12-cv-03637-MBS)

Submitted: March 29, 2016 Decided: March 31, 2016

Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and DAVIS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Roderick A. Carter, Appellant Pro Se. Christopher John Near, OGLETREE DEAKINS NASH SMOAK & STEWART, PC, Columbia, South Carolina; Danny Michael Henthorne, LITTLER MENDELSON PC, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Roderick A. Carter appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment to the defendants on Carter’s

retaliation claim filed pursuant to Title VII of the Civil

Rights Act of 1964, as amended. We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. Carter v. CPC Logistics,

Inc., No. 3:12-cv-03637-MBS (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2015). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roderick Carter v. CPC Logistics, Inc., (4th Cir. 2016).

Roderick Carter v. CPC Logistics, Inc. (Roderick Carter v. CPC Logistics, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.