Roder v. Goldsmith

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Roder v. Goldsmith

49 Misc. 2d 882, 268 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2136

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedMarch 3, 1966

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 Misc. 2d 882 (Roder v. Goldsmith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roder v. Goldsmith, 49 Misc. 2d 882, 268 N.Y.S.2d 730, 1966 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Civil Court lacked the power to assert in personam jurisdiction over the defendant on the basis of personal service of process in Nassau County. The action is founded On an out-of-city tort; the defendant is a nonresident of New York City, and the fact that he is regularly employed within the city will not justify extraterritorial service.

The orders should be reversed, with $10 costs, defendant’s motions granted and the complaint dismissed, with costs. .

Hofstadteb, J. P., Hecht and Gold, JJ., concur.

Orders reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI