Roder v. Ferkovich

722 So. 2d 925, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15641, 1998 WL 852948
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 11, 1998
DocketNo. 98-361
StatusPublished

This text of 722 So. 2d 925 (Roder v. Ferkovich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roder v. Ferkovich, 722 So. 2d 925, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15641, 1998 WL 852948 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, C.J.

The defendants below appeal an order granting a new trial after the jury found no liability on the part of defendants. The trial court did not err in granting the Ferkoviches a new trial. There was no evidence to support a finding that Roder was not negligent in running into the rear of Ferkovich’s vehicle, and there was no evidence which would support a finding that the Ferkoviches had sustained no injuries or damages as a result of the accident. Based on the foregoing, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in ordering a new trial.

AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
722 So. 2d 925, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15641, 1998 WL 852948, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roder-v-ferkovich-fladistctapp-1998.