Rodenius, T. v. Comm and K. Charlton
This text of Rodenius, T. v. Comm and K. Charlton (Rodenius, T. v. Comm and K. Charlton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN DISTRICT
TIMOTHY RODENIUS AND THE : No. 96 WM 2015 PEOPLE, : : Petitioners : : : v. : : : COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA : AND KATHLEEN MARIE CHARLTON, : : Respondents :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 5th day of February, 2016, the Application for Leave to File
Original Process is GRANTED, and the Petition for Writ of Quo Warranto and
Mandamus is DENIED.
Mr. Justice Eakin did not participate in the consideration or decision of this
matter.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rodenius, T. v. Comm and K. Charlton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodenius-t-v-comm-and-k-charlton-pa-2016.