Rodenhurst v. Cooper
This text of 171 A.D. 889 (Rodenhurst v. Cooper) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment modified by striking out the provision for specific performance and in lieu thereof adjudging that the plaintiff, as executor of the will of said Davina Cooper, has a valid claim against the estate of Victor Cooper for the expenses incurred for the care and support of the said Davina Cooper, including medical attendance from January 1, 1914, and her funeral expenses, and for a monument erected over her grave as provided in the will of said Victor Cooper; the amount of such claim to be determined, adjusted and paid in the usual course of administration of the estate of said Victor Cooper; and as so modified the judgment is affirmed, together with the order, without costs of this appeal to either party. All concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
171 A.D. 889, 155 N.Y.S. 1137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodenhurst-v-cooper-nyappdiv-1915.