Rodenbeck v. Bekasinski

176 N.E.2d 509, 9 N.Y.2d 972
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 25, 1961
StatusPublished

This text of 176 N.E.2d 509 (Rodenbeck v. Bekasinski) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodenbeck v. Bekasinski, 176 N.E.2d 509, 9 N.Y.2d 972 (N.Y. 1961).

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, without costs. As to the 14%-inch garage encroachment, counsel for defendants do not dispute that plaintiff acquired title thereto by adverse possession (Belotti v. Bickhardt, 228 N. Y. 296). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Fuld, Fboessel, Van Voorhis, Burke and Foster.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Belotti v. . Bickhardt
127 N.E. 239 (New York Court of Appeals, 1920)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
176 N.E.2d 509, 9 N.Y.2d 972, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodenbeck-v-bekasinski-ny-1961.