Roden v. Hubbard

Ohio Supreme Court

Roden v. Hubbard

404 N.E.2d 756, 62 Ohio St. 2d 217, 16 Ohio Op. 3d 248, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 723

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 21, 1980

DocketNo. 79-1038

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 404 N.E.2d 756 (Roden v. Hubbard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roden v. Hubbard, 404 N.E.2d 756, 62 Ohio St. 2d 217, 16 Ohio Op. 3d 248, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 723 (Ohio 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Court of Appeals proceeded pursuant to former R. C. 2945.39 and denied appellant’s request for release. That statute was repealed and replaced, however, by the enactment of H. B. No. 565, effective November 1, 1978. Thus, the provisions of former R. C. 2945.39 were not in existence at the time appellant sought relief. Accordingly, the court should have looked to the new enactment for resolution of the cause. For this reason, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for consideration under present statutory provisions.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes,. JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The Court of Appeals proceeded pursuant to former R. C. 2945.39 and denied appellant’s request for release. That statute was repealed and replaced, however, by the enactment of H. B. No. 565, effective November 1, 1978. Thus, the provisions of former R. C. 2945.39 were not in existence at the time appellant sought relief. Accordingly, the court should have looked to the new enactment for resolution of the cause. For this reason, the judgment of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this cause is remanded to that court for consideration under present statutory provisions.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded.

Celebrezze, C. J., Herbert, W. Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes,. JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

404 N.E.2d 756, 62 Ohio St. 2d 217, 16 Ohio Op. 3d 248, 1980 Ohio LEXIS 723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roden-v-hubbard-ohio-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack