Roden v. Diah

Fourth Circuit

Roden v. Diah

325 F. App'x 253

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2009·No. No. 09-1088·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stefanie A. Roden and James D. Haburn appeal the district court’s order dismissing their numerous federal and state law claims against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Roden v. Diah, No. 7:07-cv-00252-gec-mfu, 2008 WL 5334309 (W.D.Va. Dec. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Stefanie A. Roden and James D. Haburn appeal the district court’s order dismissing their numerous federal and state law claims against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Roden v. Diah, No. 7:07-cv-00252-gec-mfu, 2008 WL 5334309 (W.D.Va. Dec. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Roden v. Diah, 325 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

325 F. App'x 253 (Roden v. Diah) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.