Roden v. Diah

Fourth Circuit

Roden v. Diah

325 F. App'x 253

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 28, 2009

DocketNo. 09-1088

StatusPublished

This text of 325 F. App'x 253 (Roden v. Diah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roden v. Diah, 325 F. App'x 253 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stefanie A. Roden and James D. Haburn appeal the district court’s order dismissing their numerous federal and state law claims against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Roden v. Diah, No. 7:07-cv-00252-gec-mfu, 2008 WL 5334309 (W.D.Va. Dec. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Stefanie A. Roden and James D. Haburn appeal the district court’s order dismissing their numerous federal and state law claims against Defendants. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Roden v. Diah, No. 7:07-cv-00252-gec-mfu, 2008 WL 5334309 (W.D.Va. Dec. 19, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

325 F. App'x 253, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roden-v-diah-ca4-2009.