Rodell Jenkins v. Louie L. Wainwright, Warden

488 F.2d 136, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6464
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 14, 1973·No. 73-3126·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

*137 PER CURIAM:

Jenkins appeals from the denial of federal habeas relief. The trial court held that the sole issue raised below (and the sole issue on this appeal), the sufficiency vel non of the evidence at appellant’s state trial for murder as to his sanity at the time the offense was committed, did not present grounds for federal habeas relief for denial of due process. We agree.

There was competent evidence presented at the trial to substantiate the jury verdict. An issue of the sufficiency of the evidence raised by conflicting testimony supporting a state conviction does not present a due process question. See Colbroth v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1972, 466 F.2d 1193; Young v. Alabama, 5 Cir. 1971, 443 F.2d 854; Pleas v. Wainwright, 5 Cir. 1971, 441 F.2d 56; Summerville v. Cook, 5 Cir. 1971, 438 F.2d 1196. Cf. Mims v. United States, 5 Cir. 1967, 375 F.2d 135.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodell Jenkins v. Louie L. Wainwright, Warden, 488 F.2d 136, 1973 U.S. App. LEXIS 6464 (5th Cir. 1973).

488 F.2d 136 (Rodell Jenkins v. Louie L. Wainwright, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related