Rodecker v. Long

1948 OK 219, 198 P.2d 638, 200 Okla. 595, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 383
CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma
DecidedOctober 12, 1948
DocketNo. 33042
StatusPublished

This text of 1948 OK 219 (Rodecker v. Long) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodecker v. Long, 1948 OK 219, 198 P.2d 638, 200 Okla. 595, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 383 (Okla. 1948).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court. On May 5, 1947, [596]*596she filed her brief. The ' authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed.

Reversed for a new trial.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osborne v. Osborne
1933 OK 306 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1933)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1948 OK 219, 198 P.2d 638, 200 Okla. 595, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodecker-v-long-okla-1948.