Rodecker v. Long

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Rodecker v. Long

1948 OK 219, 198 P.2d 638, 200 Okla. 595, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 383

Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 12, 1948·No. No. 33042·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court. On May 5, 1947, [596] she filed her brief. The ' authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed.

Reversed for a new trial.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant has appealed from a judgment entered against her in the trial court. On May 5, 1947, [596] she filed her brief. The ' authorities therein cited reasonably sustain the allegations of error. The defendants in error have filed no brief and have offered no excuse for such failure. Under such circumstances, as stated in Osborne v. Osborne, 163 Okla. 273, 21 P. 2d 1056, it is not the duty of this court to search the record for some theory upon which to sustain the action of the trial court, but the cause will be reversed.

Reversed for a new trial.

HURST, C.J., DAVISON, V.C.J., and RILEY, WELCH, CORN, GIBSON, and LUTTRELL, JJ., concur.

Rodecker v. Long, 1948 OK 219, 198 P.2d 638, 200 Okla. 595, 1948 Okla. LEXIS 383 (Okla. 1948).

Pincite

1948 OK 219 (Rodecker v. Long) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related