Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Rode v. State

Rode v. State

646 So. 2d 855, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 41, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 183
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 1995
DocketNo. 93-1959
StatusPublished

This text of 646 So. 2d 855 (Rode v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rode v. State, 646 So. 2d 855, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 41, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 183 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm Appellant’s convictions for bribery and unlawful compensation but reverse Appellant’s sentence as to each count. Community control may not be imposed, other than as a guidelines departure, on a recommended guideline range of a non-state prison sanction. E.g. State v. Mestas, 507 So.2d 587 (Fla.1987). On remand for resentencing, the trial court may consider whether to impose a departure sentence if grounds exist. State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990).

HERSEY, STONE and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Mestas
507 So. 2d 587 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
State v. Vanhorn
561 So. 2d 584 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
646 So. 2d 855, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 41, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 183, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rode-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.