Rode v. State
646 So. 2d 855, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 41, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 183
Opinion
We affirm Appellant’s convictions for bribery and unlawful compensation but reverse Appellant’s sentence as to each count. Community control may not be imposed, other than as a guidelines departure, on a recommended guideline range of a non-state prison sanction. E.g. State v. Mestas, 507 So.2d 587 (Fla.1987). On remand for resentencing, the trial court may consider whether to impose a departure sentence if grounds exist. State v. Vanhorn, 561 So.2d 584 (Fla.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rode v. State, 646 So. 2d 855, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 41, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 183 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).
646 So. 2d 855 (Rode v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Mestas
507 So. 2d 587 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
State v. Vanhorn
561 So. 2d 584 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)