Roddy v. State

668 So. 2d 995, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 102, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 284, 1996 WL 84438
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 29, 1996·No. No. 86256·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Roddy v. State, 658 So.2d 144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995), which certified the same question of great public importance answered by this Court in State v. Daniel, 665 So.2d 1040 (Fla.1995). We have jurisdiction. Art. Y, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Daniel, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, SHAW, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roddy v. State, 668 So. 2d 995, 21 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 102, 1996 Fla. LEXIS 284, 1996 WL 84438 (Fla. 1996).

668 So. 2d 995 (Roddy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Daniel
665 So. 2d 1040 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)
Roddy v. State
658 So. 2d 144 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)