Roddy v. Rawles

1 White & W. 30
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 9, 1880
DocketNo. 1210, Op. Book No. 3, p. 419
StatusPublished

This text of 1 White & W. 30 (Roddy v. Rawles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roddy v. Rawles, 1 White & W. 30 (Tex. Ct. App. 1880).

Opinion

Opinion by

White, P. J.

§ 69. Allegation of breach of contract. In a suit for a breach of rent contract, the petition alleged that “defendant never complied with the terms of the written contract, in this, that defendant failed and refused to pay plaintiffs for the work and labor done by them on defendant’s farm during the year 1876, as stipulated for in said contract, and that they did work, the value of which is reasonably worth the sum of $100.” Held, that while this allegation is very general, it was sufficient, in the absence of any special exception to it, to entitle the plaintiff to introduce evidence of the breach of the contract, and [31]*31of the value of the work and labor done. [Sayles’ PI. § 61; Holman v. Criswell, 15 Tex. 394.]

June 9, 1880.

Eeversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Holman v. Criswell
15 Tex. 394 (Texas Supreme Court, 1855)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 White & W. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roddy-v-rawles-texapp-1880.