Roddy v. Nederlander Producing Co. of America, Inc.

941 N.E.2d 1155, 15 N.Y.3d 944
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 21, 2010·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiff’s complaint as against defendants

[946] Nederlander Producing Company of America, Inc. and The Gershwin Theatre reinstated.

Plaintiff did not have a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue of defendants’ negligence. The issue of defendants’ negligence was previously determined in an Appellate Division order granting defendants summary judgment on a third-party contractual indemnification claim against plaintiffs employer, third-party defendant Abhann Productions, Inc. Plaintiff had no interest in the outcome of the third-party indemnification claim. Plaintiff thus had neither incentive to litigate the motion for summary judgment nor adequate notice that the issue of defendants’ negligence could be conclusively decided against him. Under these circumstances, the law of the case doctrine does not preclude plaintiff from litigating the issue of defendants’ negligence.

Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones concur in memorandum.

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roddy v. Nederlander Producing Co. of America, Inc., 941 N.E.2d 1155, 15 N.Y.3d 944 (N.Y. 2010).

941 N.E.2d 1155 (Roddy v. Nederlander Producing Co. of America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rotter v. Ripka
2020 NY Slip Op 2859 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Gadani v. Debrino Caulking Associates, Inc.
86 A.D.3d 689 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)