Roddy v. Kingsbury

5 Tex. 151
Texas Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1849·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

There is no statement of facts and no error apparent upon the record. It does not appear what the evidence was which is referred to in tho bill o£ exceptions. It was proper for the court to instruct the jury to disregard incompetent evidence and a plea which presented no valid defense to the action. Where there is either no evidence or none which is competent to support any material issue in the case, so to instruct the jury is no infraction of the statute which forbids that the judge shall charge upon the weight of evidence. This rule can only apply where there is evidence competent for the jury to weigh. The rulings of the court disclosed by the record appear to have been substantially correct. And the objections to the judgment presented by the assignment of errors are not deemed of a character to require further notice.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roddy v. Kingsbury, 5 Tex. 151 (Tex. 1849).

5 Tex. 151 (Roddy v. Kingsbury) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Red River National Bank v. Ferguson
206 S.W. 923 (Texas Supreme Court, 1918)