Roddy L. Gillus v. Michael B. Cooksey, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia

878 F.2d 1430, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9483, 1989 WL 74928
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 5, 1989
Docket89-6518
StatusUnpublished

This text of 878 F.2d 1430 (Roddy L. Gillus v. Michael B. Cooksey, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roddy L. Gillus v. Michael B. Cooksey, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute, Morgantown, West Virginia, 878 F.2d 1430, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9483, 1989 WL 74928 (4th Cir. 1989).

Opinion

878 F.2d 1430
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Roddy L. GILLUS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Michael B. COOKSEY, Warden, Federal Correctional Institute,
Morgantown, West Virginia, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 89-6518.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 7, 1989.
Decided July 5, 1989.

Roddy L. Gillus, appellant pro se.

Before K.K. HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Roddy L. Gillus appeals from the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Gillus v. Cooksey, C/A No. 88-155-E (N.D.W.Va. Dec. 27, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

*

In view of the disposition in this case, Gillus' application for release on bail pending this appeal and his motion for stay pending this appeal are denied. We note that Gillus' direct appeal is pending in this Court. The denial of the motion for release on bail, therefore, is without prejudice to Gillus' seeking that relief in the Maryland district court, and, if unsuccessful, applying to this court for release on bail pending his direct appeal

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
878 F.2d 1430, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 9483, 1989 WL 74928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roddy-l-gillus-v-michael-b-cooksey-warden-federal-correctional-ca4-1989.