Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Roddenberry v. State

Roddenberry v. State

82 S.E.2d 40, 90 Ga. App. 66, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 631
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 13, 1954·No. 35116·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Carlisle, J.

The assignment of error in the sole special ground of the motion for new trial, that the defendant’s right of cross-examination was abridged by the trial court’s refusal to require the sheriif of the county to divulge the name of the “decoy” who accompanied the revenue officer to the defendant’s home and was supposedly present at the time the defendant sold the whisks' to the revenue agent, is determinative of this case; and upon this point this case is controlled by the decision in Crosby v. State, ante.

Judgment reversed.

Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roddenberry v. State, 82 S.E.2d 40, 90 Ga. App. 66, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 631 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954).

82 S.E.2d 40 (Roddenberry v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thornton v. State
231 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Taylor v. State
136 Ga. App. 31 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Wilson v. Hopper
218 S.E.2d 573 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Butler v. State
194 S.E.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Williams v. Mayor &C. of Atlanta
163 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Smallwood v. State
98 S.E.2d 602 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)