Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Roddenberry v. State

Roddenberry v. State

82 S.E.2d 40, 90 Ga. App. 66, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 631
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 13, 1954
Docket35116
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 82 S.E.2d 40 (Roddenberry v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roddenberry v. State, 82 S.E.2d 40, 90 Ga. App. 66, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 631 (Ga. Ct. App. 1954).

Opinion

Carlisle, J.

The assignment of error in the sole special ground of the motion for new trial, that the defendant’s right of cross-examination was abridged by the trial court’s refusal to require the sheriif of the county to divulge the name of the “decoy” who accompanied the revenue officer to the defendant’s home and was supposedly present at the time the defendant sold the whisks' to the revenue agent, is determinative of this case; and upon this point this case is controlled by the decision in Crosby v. State, ante.

Judgment reversed.

Gardner, P. J., and Townsend, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thornton v. State
231 S.E.2d 729 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Taylor v. State
136 Ga. App. 31 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1975)
Wilson v. Hopper
218 S.E.2d 573 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1975)
Butler v. State
194 S.E.2d 261 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1972)
Williams v. Mayor &C. of Atlanta
163 S.E.2d 239 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1968)
Smallwood v. State
98 S.E.2d 602 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 S.E.2d 40, 90 Ga. App. 66, 1954 Ga. App. LEXIS 631, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roddenberry-v-state-gactapp-1954.