Rodd v. Secretary of Health and Human Services
Opinion
In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS Case No. 13-122V Filed: March 21, 2016 (Not to be published)
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ANDREW RODD, *
*
Petitioner, * Decision on Damages;
v. * Influenza (Flu) Vaccine; Overlap * Syndrome; Sjogren’s Syndrome;
SECRETARY OF HEALTH * Polymyositis; Inflammatory Arthritis AND HUMAN SERVICES, *
*
Respondent. *
*
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Lawrence R. Cohan, Anapol Schwartz, et al., Philadelphia, PA, for petitioner. Gordon E. Shemin, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC for respondent.
DECISION ON DAMAGES1
Gowen, Special Master:
On February 15, 2013, Andrew Rodd (“petitioner”) filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.2 (the “Vaccine Act” or “the Program”). Petitioner alleged that as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on September 14, 2011, he developed numbness and tingling in his hands due to the aggravation of an underlying, asymptomatic carpal tunnel syndrome, and that over the course of weeks after the vaccine, his condition evolved into symptomatic polyarthritis, polymyositis, inflammatory arthritis, and Sjogren’s syndrome. See Petition at Preamble. The undersigned 1 Because this unpublished ruling contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, I intend to post this ruling on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E- Government Act of 2002, 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to delete medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, I agree that the identified material fits within this definition, I will delete such material from public access. 2 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012).
issues a Ruling on Entitlement finding petitioner entitled to compensation based on an injury caused-in-fact by a covered vaccine on December 11, 2015.
On March 18, 2016, respondent filed a Proffer on an award of compensation, indicating that petitioner has agreed to compensation in the amount of $871,362.80, to be paid to petitioner only, for life care expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment, lost earnings, pain and suffering, and past unreimburseable expenses. Petitioner shall also receive an amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract described in section II(B) of the Proffer, attached hereto as Appendix A. Petitioner’s counsel was contacted by the undersigned’s chambers on March 21, 2016, and he confirmed petitioner’s agreement with the proposed compensation amounts. Pursuant to the terms in the attached Proffer, the undersigned awards petitioner the following compensation for all damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a):
1. A lump sum payment of $871,362.80 in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Andrew Rodd; and
2. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract to provide the benefits described in section II, paragraph B of the Proffer, to be paid to a life insurance company meeting the criteria described in footnote 4.
The clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
s/Thomas L. Gowen Thomas L. Gowen Special Master
3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by each party filing a notice renouncing the right to seek review.
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS
ANDREW RODD,
Petitioner,
v. No. 13-122V Special Master Gowen
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND ECF HUMAN SERVICES,
Respondent.
RESPONDENT'S PROFFER ON AWARD OF COMPENSATION
I. Items of Compensation
A. Life Care Items
Respondent engaged life care planner Linda Curtis, RN, MS, CCM, CNLCP, and
petitioner engaged Roberta Hurley, to provide an estimation of Andrew Rodd’s future vaccine-
injury related needs. For the purposes of this proffer, the term “vaccine related” is as described
in the Special Master’s Ruling on Entitlement, filed November 13, 2015. All items of
compensation identified in the life care plan are supported by the evidence, and are illustrated by
the chart entitled Appendix A: Items of Compensation for Andrew Rodd, attached hereto as Tab
A. 1 Respondent proffers that Andrew Rodd should be awarded all items of compensation set
forth in the life care plan and illustrated by the chart attached at Tab A. Petitioner agrees.
1 The chart at Tab A illustrates the annual benefits provided by the life care plan. The annual benefit years run from the date of judgment up to the first anniversary of the date of judgment, and every year thereafter up to the anniversary of the date of judgment.
B. Lost Earnings
The parties agree that based upon the evidence of record, Andrew Rodd will suffer a loss
of earnings in the future. Therefore, respondent proffers that Andrew Rodd should be awarded
lost earnings as provided under the Vaccine Act. 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(3)(A). Respondent
proffers that the appropriate award for Andrew Rodd’s lost earnings is $561,772.81. Petitioner
agrees.
C. Pain and Suffering
Respondent proffers that Andrew Rodd should be awarded $232,625.79 in actual and
projected pain and suffering. This amount reflects that any award for projected pain and
suffering has been reduced to net present value. See 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)(4). Petitioner
agrees.
D. Past Unreimbursable Expenses
Evidence supplied by petitioner documents his expenditure of past unreimbursable
expenses related to his vaccine-related injury. Respondent proffers that petitioner should be
awarded past unreimbursable expenses in the amount of $6,675.40. Petitioner agrees.
E. Medicaid Lien
Petitioner represents that there are no Medicaid liens outstanding against him.
II. Form of the Award
The parties recommend that the compensation provided to Andrew Rodd should be made
through a combination of lump sum payments and future annuity payments as described below,
and request that the Special Master’s decision and the Court’s judgment award the following: 2
2
Should petitioner die prior to entry of judgment, the parties reserve the right to move the Court for appropriate relief. In particular, respondent would oppose any award for future medical expenses, future lost earnings, and future pain and suffering.
A. A lump sum payment of $871,362.80, representing compensation for life care
expenses expected to be incurred during the first year after judgment ($70,288.80), lost earnings
($561,772.81), pain and suffering ($232,625.79), and past unreimbursable expenses ($6,675.40),
in the form of a check payable to petitioner, Andrew Rodd.
B. An amount sufficient to purchase an annuity contract, 3 subject to the conditions
described below, that will provide payments for the life care items contained in the life care plan,
as illustrated by the chart at Tab A, attached hereto, paid to the life insurance company 4 from
which the annuity will be purchased. 5 Compensation for Year Two (beginning on the first
anniversary of the date of judgment) and all subsequent years shall be provided through
respondent’s purchase of an annuity, which annuity shall make payments directly to petitioner,
Andrew Rodd, only so long as Andrew Rodd is alive at the time a particular payment is due. At
the Secretary’s sole discretion, the periodic payments may be provided to petitioner in monthly,
quarterly, annual or other installments. The “annual amounts” set forth in the chart at Tab A
describe only the total yearly sum to be paid to petitioner and do not require that the payment be
made in one annual installment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rodd v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Rodd v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.