Rodbell v. Gotham Despatch & Express Co.
This text of 111 N.Y.S. 528 (Rodbell v. Gotham Despatch & Express Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Admitting, by not denying, ownership in the plaintiff of certain coats committed by him to it, a common carrier, to be delivered to another, the defendant admitted the competency of the plaintiff to bring this action, taking the case out of the rule in Krulder v. Ellison, 47 N. Y. 36, 7 Am. Rep. 402; and so, the value of the goods and their loss being conceded on the trial, on the one hand, and the counterclaim, on the other, there remained only rendering a judgment for the plaintiff, and no cause for appeal.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
111 N.Y.S. 528, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodbell-v-gotham-despatch-express-co-nyappterm-1908.