Rodas v. State

65 So. 3d 98, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9650, 2011 WL 2473050
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 2011·No. 1D11-0047·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant claims that he was not awarded proper prior prison credit following resentencing pursuant to Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000). The state has conceded that the matter should be reversed and remanded. We therefore reverse and remand for the trial court to either attach documents conclusively refuting the appellant’s prison credit claim, or for the court to award the appellant the credit he seeks. See Davidson v. State, 780 So.2d 984 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (stating that upon resentencing a defendant is entitled to prison credit for time already served).

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

VAN NORTWICK, PADOVANO, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodas v. State, 65 So. 3d 98, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 9650, 2011 WL 2473050 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

65 So. 3d 98 (Rodas v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Heggs v. State
759 So. 2d 620 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)
Davidson v. State
780 So. 2d 984 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)