Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided November 26, 2024·No. 01-23-00461-CV·Published

Opinion

Opinion issued November 26, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

accordance with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The

parties also asked that costs be taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d).

We grant the motion, set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the

merits, and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance

with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We direct the Clerk

of this Court to tax costs against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(d). We further direct the Clerk of this Court to issue the mandate within 10 days

of the date of this opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1; Sam’s Limousine & Transp.,

Inc. v. CIVE, Inc., No. 01-22-00955-CV, 2024 WL 39831, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 4, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op.) (directing Clerk of Court to

issue mandate within 10 days of opinion).

PER CURIAM

Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. (Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.