Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 26, 2024
Docket01-23-00461-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc. (Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc., (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Opinion

Opinion issued November 26, 2024

In The

Court of Appeals For The

First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-23-00461-CV ——————————— RODAN TRANSPORT USA LTD., D/B/A AVEDA TRANSPORTATION AND ENERGY SERVICES, Appellant V. NABORS DRILLING TECHNOLOGIES USA, INC., Appellee

On Appeal from the 190th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2020-01988

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The parties have filed an “Agreement to Set Aside the Trial Court Judgment

and Remand to the Trial Court.” They represent that they have reached an agreement

to settle this matter and ask that we set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard

to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). The

parties also asked that costs be taxed against the party incurring same. See TEX. R.

APP. P. 42.1(d).

We grant the motion, set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the

merits, and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of judgment in accordance

with the parties’ agreement. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(2)(B). We direct the Clerk

of this Court to tax costs against the party incurring same. See TEX. R. APP. P.

42.1(d). We further direct the Clerk of this Court to issue the mandate within 10 days

of the date of this opinion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 18.1; Sam’s Limousine & Transp.,

Inc. v. CIVE, Inc., No. 01-22-00955-CV, 2024 WL 39831, at *1 (Tex. App.—

Houston [1st Dist.] Jan. 4, 2024, no pet.) (mem. op.) (directing Clerk of Court to

issue mandate within 10 days of opinion).

PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Hightower and Countiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Rodan Transport USA Ltd., D/B/A Aveda Transportation and Energy Services v. Nabors Drilling Technologies USA, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rodan-transport-usa-ltd-dba-aveda-transportation-and-energy-services-v-texapp-2024.