Rocky Takushi v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, Lp

542 F. App'x 593
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 16, 2013·No. 12-15211·Unpublished

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

The district court properly dismissed Takushi’s Truth in Lending Act (TILA) claim because it is time barred. Under TILA, a borrower seeking to rescind a mortgage loan must bring suit within three years of consummation of the loan (with one exception not relevant here). 15 U.S.C. § 1635(f). Takushi’s loan closed on September 21, 2007, but he did not file suit until February 9, 2011. That Takushi sent a notice of rescission within the three-year period is irrelevant under our decision in McOmie-Gray v. Bank of America Home Loans, 667 F.3d 1325, 1329 (9th Cir.2012). The rule announced in McOmie-Gray applies retroactively to “all cases still open on direct review,” regardless of whether the underlying events pre-date announcement of the rule. Harper v. Va. Dep’t of Taxation, 509 U.S. 86, 97, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993); see also Morales-Izquierdo v. DHS, 600 F.3d 1076, 1087-88 (9th Cir.2010).

AFFIRMED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rocky Takushi v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, Lp, 542 F. App'x 593 (9th Cir. 2013).

542 F. App'x 593 (Rocky Takushi v. Bac Home Loans Servicing, Lp) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Morales-Izquierdo v. Department of Homeland Security
600 F.3d 1076 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation
509 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Kathryn McOmie v. Bank of America Home Loans
667 F.3d 1325 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)