Rocky Ridge Ranch Property Owners Ass'n v. Smith

14 S.W.3d 623, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 790
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 8, 1999
DocketNos. 74334, 74640
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 14 S.W.3d 623 (Rocky Ridge Ranch Property Owners Ass'n v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rocky Ridge Ranch Property Owners Ass'n v. Smith, 14 S.W.3d 623, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 790 (Mo. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellants, Russell and Marcella Smith, appeal from the trial court’s judgment denying their Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment. We affirm.

A trial court may set aside a default judgment “upon motion stating facts constituting a meritorious defense and good cause shown....” Rule 74.05(d). A motion to set aside a judgment, however, cannot prove itself. Dallas-Johnson Properties v. Hubbard, 823 S.W.2d 5, 6 (MoApp. E.D.1991). The motion must be verified or supported by affidavits or sworn testimony produced at the hearing on the motion. Id.

Here, Appellants’ Motion to Set Aside Default Judgment was not verified. There were no affidavits to support the motion and there was no sworn testimony at the motion hearing. Thus, the trial court did not err in denying Appellants’ motion.1

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hinton v. Proctor & Schwartz, Inc.
99 S.W.3d 454 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2003)
Reed v. Reed
48 S.W.3d 634 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2001)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 S.W.3d 623, 1999 Mo. App. LEXIS 790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocky-ridge-ranch-property-owners-assn-v-smith-moctapp-1999.