Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. Corey
740 F.3d 507
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 22, 2014·No. 12-15135, 12-15131·Published·Cited by 5 cases
Opinions
Concurrence by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.
ORDER
The full court was advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. Corey, 740 F.3d 507 (9th Cir. 2014).
740 F.3d 507 (Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. Corey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Damon v. Kijakazi
D. Idaho, 2023
American Fuel & Petrochemical v. Jane O'Keeffe
903 F.3d 903 (Ninth Circuit, 2018)
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Corey
258 F. Supp. 3d 1134 (E.D. California, 2017)
American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers v. O'Keeffe
134 F. Supp. 3d 1270 (D. Oregon, 2015)
North Dakota v. Heydinger
15 F. Supp. 3d 891 (D. Minnesota, 2014)