Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. Corey
This text of 740 F.3d 507 (Rocky Mountain Farmers Union v. Richard W. Corey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Concurrence by Judge GOULD; Dissent by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.
ORDER
The full court was advised of the petitions for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc, and the matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petitions for rehearing en banc are DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
740 F.3d 507, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocky-mountain-farmers-union-v-richard-w-corey-ca9-2014.