Rocky Jimenez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided March 29, 2012·No. 07-12-00101-CR·Published

Opinion

NO. 07-12-0101-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

AT AMARILLO

PANEL C

MARCH 29, 2012 ______________________________

ROCKY JIMENEZ,

Appellant

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS,

Appellee _______________________________

FROM THE 364th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;

NO. 2012-433,593; HON. BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING _______________________________

ORDER OF DISMISSAL _______________________________

Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.

Appellant, Rocky Jimenez, appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled

substance with intent to deliver. The certification of right to appeal stated that 1) the

criminal proceeding was “a plea-bargain case and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

This circumstance was brought to the attention of appellant and opportunity was granted

him to obtain an amended certification entitling him to appeal. No such certification was

received within the allotted time. Having no certification indicating that appellant has a right to appeal his conviction, we dismiss the appeal per Texas Rule of Appellate

Procedure 25.2(d).

Per Curiam

Do not publish.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rocky Jimenez v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Rocky Jimenez v. State (Rocky Jimenez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.