Rocky Jimenez v. State
This text of Rocky Jimenez v. State (Rocky Jimenez v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-12-0101-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
MARCH 29, 2012 ______________________________
ROCKY JIMENEZ,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _______________________________
FROM THE 364th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2012-433,593; HON. BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING _______________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ. Appellant, Rocky Jimenez, appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. The certification of right to appeal stated that 1) the criminal proceeding was "a plea-bargain case and the defendant has NO right of appeal." This circumstance was brought to the attention of appellant and opportunity was granted him to obtain an amended certification entitling him to appeal. No such certification was received within the allotted time. Having no certification indicating that appellant has a right to appeal his conviction, we dismiss the appeal per Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 25.2(d).
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rocky Jimenez v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocky-jimenez-v-state-texapp-2012.