Rocky Jimenez v. State
Opinion
NO. 07-12-0101-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL C
MARCH 29, 2012 ______________________________
ROCKY JIMENEZ,
Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS,
Appellee _______________________________
FROM THE 364th DISTRICT COURT OF LUBBOCK COUNTY;
NO. 2012-433,593; HON. BRADLEY S. UNDERWOOD, PRESIDING _______________________________
ORDER OF DISMISSAL _______________________________
Before QUINN, C.J., and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
Appellant, Rocky Jimenez, appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled
substance with intent to deliver. The certification of right to appeal stated that 1) the
criminal proceeding was “a plea-bargain case and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
This circumstance was brought to the attention of appellant and opportunity was granted
him to obtain an amended certification entitling him to appeal. No such certification was
received within the allotted time. Having no certification indicating that appellant has a right to appeal his conviction, we dismiss the appeal per Texas Rule of Appellate
Procedure 25.2(d).
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rocky Jimenez v. State (Rocky Jimenez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.