Rocky Ford Canal Co. v. Cox, Judge
This text of 66 P.2d 370 (Rocky Ford Canal Co. v. Cox, Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Utah Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This court on July 8, 1936, made and entered its decision in this case denying a permanent writ of prohibition, and recalling and setting aside the temporary writ theretofore issued. 92 Utah 148, 59 P. (2d) 935. A rehearing was thereafter granted which had the effect of recalling the decision above referred to. The case has now been reargued and resubmitted. The issue presented involved the question of jurisdiction of the trial court, where there is pending before it a case of general adjudication of the waters of a stream, to entertain and act on an application for a temporary change in point of diversion or place of use of any of the waters of such stream. The petition before the trial court was for a temporary change for the current season only. By lapse of time the cause has become moot. Any decision looking to the establishment of a rule for guidance in the future *177 would be unwise at this time. There was legislation on the subject enacted at the recent session of the State Legislature.
The decision heretofore rendered is withdrawn and the cause dismissed. Neither party to recover costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
66 P.2d 370, 92 Utah 175, 1937 Utah LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocky-ford-canal-co-v-cox-judge-utah-1937.