Rocky Coronado v. State
This text of Rocky Coronado v. State (Rocky Coronado v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order entered February 6, 2017
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-16-01001-CR No. 05-16-01002-CR No. 05-16-01003-CR No. 05-16-01004-CR No. 05-16-01005-CR No. 05-16-01006-CR No. 05-16-01007-CR No. 05-16-01008-CR No. 05-16-01009-CR
ROCKY CORONADO, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 283rd Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause Nos. F14-00535-T, F14-00536-T, F14-00537-T, F14-56962-T, F14-56967- T, F14-56969-T, F14-76064-T, F14-76111-T, F14-76115-T
ORDER Before the Court are appellant’s January 30, 2017 motion to extend the time to file
appellant’s brief and the motion to withdraw as counsel filed by appellant’s counsel, Christopher
Graham. We GRANT appellant’s motion to extend and ORDER appellant’s brief filed sixty days
from the date of this order. We DENY Graham’s motion to withdraw for noncompliance with
the rules of appellate procedure. See TEX. R. APP. P. 6.5(a)(2),(3).
We ORDER the trial court to conduct a hearing to determine the status of appellant’s
representation. The trial court shall make appropriate findings and recommendations. The trial
court shall make the following determinations:
First, the trial court shall determine whether appellant desires to pursue the appeals.
If the trial court determines that appellant does desire to pursue the appeals, the trial court
shall next determine whether appellant is indigent and entitled to court-appointed counsel. If the
trial court determines that appellant is indigent, we ORDER the trial court to appoint counsel to
represent him.
If the trial court determines that appellant is not indigent, the trial court shall determine
whether current counsel should be allowed to withdraw, whether appellant has retained new
counsel, and whether appellant has made the necessary arrangements for filing a brief. If
appellant desires to proceed with the appeals pro se, the trial court shall determine appellant’s
address for correspondence.
We ORDER the trial court to transmit a record of the proceedings, which shall include
written findings and recommendations and, if appropriate, an order appointing counsel, to this
Court within THIRTY DAYS of the date of this order.
These appeals are ABATED to allow the trial court to comply with the above order. The
appeals shall be reinstated thirty days from the date of this order or when the findings are
received, whichever is earlier.
/s/ ADA BROWN JUSTICE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rocky Coronado v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocky-coronado-v-state-texapp-2017.