Rockwood v. Whiting
This text of 118 Mass. 337 (Rockwood v. Whiting) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the well settled construction of the Gen. Sts. c. 155, § 9, and of the statute of New York from which it was taken, a person who has a domicil and actual residence in another state, and only comes into this state occasionally, or even for a few hours daily, is “ absent from and resides out of the state,” and the statute of limitations does not run in his favor. Milton v. Babson, 6 Allen, 322. Burroughs v. Bloomer, 5 Denio, 532.
In Turner v. Shearer, 6 Gray, 427, the defendant was in this state, though in • prison during the whole time in question, and there was no evidence that he had ever acquired a domicil elsewhere. Judgment for the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 Mass. 337, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockwood-v-whiting-mass-1875.