Rockwell v. State

2 Ohio Law. Abs. 666
CourtCourt of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division
DecidedJuly 16, 1924
DocketNo. 97655
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 666 (Rockwell v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rockwell v. State, 2 Ohio Law. Abs. 666 (Ohio Super. Ct. 1924).

Opinion

ROGERS, J.

Epitomized Opinion

Published Only In Ohio Law Abstract

Rockwell and 13 others were tried, convicted and sentenced by one Kuhn, a Justice of the Peace of Marion township, for violation of the gambling statutes. The warrants that were sworn out before Kuhn did not allege that the offenses were committed in Marion township, but charged that they were committed in Franklin county. By consent one bill of exceptions was prepared for all the cases and error was prosecuted to the Common Pleas which held:.

The statute confers no final jurisdiction in this kind of cases unless upon consent of the prisoner or upon a plea of guilty and in these cases neither of those two things occurred. If the magistrate had any jurisdiction at all, ,it was to conduct a preliminary examination only. As a final trial court the magistrate exceeded his jurisdiction and the cases must be reversed.

By 1558-55a GC. creating a Municipal Court of the City of Columbus no justice of the peace in Franklin county, other than Montgomery township, shall have jurisdiction unless the offense charged shall be alleged to have been committed within his township. Hence the magistrate under these warrants had nd jurisdiction. Judgment reversed and defendants discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Ohio Law. Abs. 666, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockwell-v-state-ohctcomplfrankl-1924.