Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United States

31 Ct. Int'l Trade 788

United States Court of International Trade·Decided July 1, 2007·No. Court No. 03-00007·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

EATON, Judge:

Upon consideration of the parties’ response to the court’s Opinion and Order of May 7, 2007 (Slip Op. 07-67), it is hereby

ORDERED that the subject merchandise identified on the commercial invoices as “short body timer” model numbers 700-HR52 TA17B; 700-HR52TU243; 700-HRC12TA173; 700-HRC12TU24B; 700- HRM12TU24B and 700-HRM12TA17B is classified under Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the united States (“HTSUS”) subheading 8536.49.00; and it is further

[789]*789ORDERED that the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shall re-liquidate the subject entries reflecting that the above-listed short body timers be classified under HTSUS subheading 8536.49.00 and pay refunds to plaintiff, together with interest as provided by law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

EATON, Judge:

Upon consideration of the parties’ response to the court’s Opinion and Order of May 7, 2007 (Slip Op. 07-67), it is hereby

Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United States, 31 Ct. Int'l Trade 788 (cit 2007).

Pincite

31 Ct. Int'l Trade 788 (Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.