Rocktop Partners, LLC v. SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 * * *

9 Capital One, National Association, et al., Case No. 2:17-cv-00604-RFB-BNW

10 Plaintiffs, ORDER 11 v.

12 SFR Investments Pool 1, LLC et al.,

13 Defendants.

14 15 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 394] of 16 the Honorable Brenda Weksler, United States Magistrate Judge, entered September 14, 2021. 17 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 18 recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific 19 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 28 U.S.C. § 20 636(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 21 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed 22 findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); see also Local 23 Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct 24 “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. 25 Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due 26 by December 22, 2021. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this 27 case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. 28 . . . 1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 394] is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that that ECF No. 361 is DENIED. 4 5 DATED: January 27, 2022. □ " ° RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 7 United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-