Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Sanzo

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Sanzo

173 A.3d 391, 327 Conn. 968

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedNovember 21, 2017

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 173 A.3d 391 (Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Sanzo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rockstone Capital, LLC v. Sanzo, 173 A.3d 391, 327 Conn. 968 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition by the defendants John Sanzo and Maria Sanzo for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 175 Conn. App. 770, 171 A.3d 77 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the appeal and cross appeal were taken from a final judgment of the trial court?

"2. If the answer to the first question is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff's postjudgment mortgage encumbering the same property and the same debt as the plaintiffs judgment liens was a consensual lien, and not a de facto waiver of the homestead exemption; see General Statutes § 52-352b (t) ; that would be void as a matter of public policy?"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition by the defendants John Sanzo and Maria Sanzo for certification to appeal from the Appellate Court, 175 Conn. App. 770, 171 A.3d 77 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the appeal and cross appeal were taken from a final judgment of the trial court?

"2. If the answer to the first question is yes, did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff's postjudgment mortgage encumbering the same property and the same debt as the plaintiffs judgment liens was a consensual lien, and not a de facto waiver of the homestead exemption; see General Statutes § 52-352b (t) ; that would be void as a matter of public policy?"

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

173 A.3d 391, 327 Conn. 968, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockstone-capital-llc-v-sanzo-conn-2017.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack