Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.

Third Circuit

Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.

342 F.2d 996, 5 V.I. 200, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6072

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 31, 1965

DocketNo. 14,991

StatusPublished

This text of 342 F.2d 996 (Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co., 342 F.2d 996, 5 V.I. 200, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6072 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a suit for unpaid and overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Asserting that the plaintiff was an executive employee not covered by the Act [201]*201the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment accompanied by supporting affidavits. The plaintiff filed no counter affidavits, relying solely upon a stipulation which his counsel alleges he entered into with counsel for the defendant in open court but which the record fails to substantiate. The district court entered a summary judgment for the defendant which is fully supported by the opinion filed by Judge Gordon in the district court. 4 V.I. 555, 230 F.Supp. 23. Upon that opinion the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This is a suit for unpaid and overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Asserting that the plaintiff was an executive employee not covered by the Act [201]*201the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment accompanied by supporting affidavits. The plaintiff filed no counter affidavits, relying solely upon a stipulation which his counsel alleges he entered into with counsel for the defendant in open court but which the record fails to substantiate. The district court entered a summary judgment for the defendant which is fully supported by the opinion filed by Judge Gordon in the district court. 4 V.I. 555, 230 F.Supp. 23. Upon that opinion the judgment will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

342 F.2d 996, 5 V.I. 200, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockoff-v-vitex-manufacturing-co-ca3-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack