Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.

Third Circuit

Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.

342 F.2d 996, 5 V.I. 200, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6072

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided March 31, 1965·No. No. 14,991·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

This is a suit for unpaid and overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Asserting that the plaintiff was an executive employee not covered by the Act [201]*201the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment accompanied by supporting affidavits. The plaintiff filed no counter affidavits, relying solely upon a stipulation which his counsel alleges he entered into with counsel for the defendant in open court but which the record fails to substantiate. The district court entered a summary judgment for the defendant which is fully supported by the opinion filed by Judge Gordon in the district court. 4 V.I. 555, 230 F.Supp. 23. Upon that opinion the judgment will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

This is a suit for unpaid and overtime compensation under the Fair Labor Standards Act. Asserting that the plaintiff was an executive employee not covered by the Act [201]*201the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment accompanied by supporting affidavits. The plaintiff filed no counter affidavits, relying solely upon a stipulation which his counsel alleges he entered into with counsel for the defendant in open court but which the record fails to substantiate. The district court entered a summary judgment for the defendant which is fully supported by the opinion filed by Judge Gordon in the district court. 4 V.I. 555, 230 F.Supp. 23. Upon that opinion the judgment will be affirmed.

Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co., 342 F.2d 996, 5 V.I. 200, 1965 U.S. App. LEXIS 6072 (3d Cir. 1965).

Pincite

342 F.2d 996 (Rockoff v. Vitex Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related