Rocklen's Auto Parts & Service, Inc. v. Rakiec

506 A.2d 168, 6 Conn. App. 504, 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 887
CourtConnecticut Appellate Court
DecidedMarch 18, 1986
Docket4142
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 506 A.2d 168 (Rocklen's Auto Parts & Service, Inc. v. Rakiec) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rocklen's Auto Parts & Service, Inc. v. Rakiec, 506 A.2d 168, 6 Conn. App. 504, 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 887 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Since the defendant failed to comply with the provisions of General Statutes § 52-212 and Practice Book § 377, the trial court was correct in refusing to grant the defendant’s motion to open the judgment by default.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Waterfield
925 A.2d 451 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)
Bufferd v. Yost
719 A.2d 487 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)
Dister Corp. v. Northco, Inc.
719 A.2d 485 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
506 A.2d 168, 6 Conn. App. 504, 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocklens-auto-parts-service-inc-v-rakiec-connappct-1986.