Rocklen's Auto Parts & Service, Inc. v. Rakiec
506 A.2d 168, 6 Conn. App. 504, 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 887
Opinion
Since the defendant failed to comply with the provisions of General Statutes § 52-212 and Practice Book § 377, the trial court was correct in refusing to grant the defendant’s motion to open the judgment by default.
There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rocklen's Auto Parts & Service, Inc. v. Rakiec, 506 A.2d 168, 6 Conn. App. 504, 1986 Conn. App. LEXIS 887 (Colo. Ct. App. 1986).
506 A.2d 168 (Rocklen's Auto Parts & Service, Inc. v. Rakiec) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Insurance Co. of Pennsylvania v. Waterfield
925 A.2d 451 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2007)
Bufferd v. Yost
719 A.2d 487 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)
Dister Corp. v. Northco, Inc.
719 A.2d 485 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1998)