Rockland Hardware Co. v. Goulding

103 A. 1047, 117 Me. 564, 1918 Me. LEXIS 59
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 14, 1918
StatusPublished

This text of 103 A. 1047 (Rockland Hardware Co. v. Goulding) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rockland Hardware Co. v. Goulding, 103 A. 1047, 117 Me. 564, 1918 Me. LEXIS 59 (Me. 1918).

Opinion

The case is before the court on motion by the defendant to set aside the verdict rendered in favor of the plaintiff. No questions of law are raised and the issue is [565]*565whether there was sufficient evidence to warrant the jury in finding the existence of agency on the part of one Ames and one Allen so as to charge the principal defendant for goods sold and delivered by the plaintiff.

After a careful examination of the record the court is of opinion that there is sufficient evidence upon which to base the verdict of the jury, and the entry must be: Motion overruled. Charles T. Smalley, for plaintiff. Frank B. Miller, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A. 1047, 117 Me. 564, 1918 Me. LEXIS 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockland-hardware-co-v-goulding-me-1918.