Rocking Chair Motel, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rocking Chair Motel, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

529 So. 2d 1277, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1985, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3754, 1988 WL 86871

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 25, 1988

DocketNo. 87-2372

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 529 So. 2d 1277 (Rocking Chair Motel, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rocking Chair Motel, Inc. v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., 529 So. 2d 1277, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1985, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3754, 1988 WL 86871 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

SHARP, Chief Judge.

We reverse the final summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, etc., because the affidavit filed in this case opposing summary judgment created a factual dispute as to payment and failure of consideration of the mortgage debt, and possibly set-off rights based on unauthorized taking of the mortgagor’s funds. The charges (artfully pled in the affidavit) are serious, and we at this point in the procedings must take them as true. See,, e.g., Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1985); Lynch v. Tennyson, 443 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Thompson v. Citizens National Bank of Leesburg, Florida, 433 So.2d 32, 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); O’Connell v. Walt Disney World Company, 413 So.2d 444 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

REVERSED.

DAUKSCH and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SHARP, Chief Judge.

We reverse the final summary judgment of foreclosure in favor of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, etc., because the affidavit filed in this case opposing summary judgment created a factual dispute as to payment and failure of consideration of the mortgage debt, and possibly set-off rights based on unauthorized taking of the mortgagor’s funds. The charges (artfully pled in the affidavit) are serious, and we at this point in the procedings must take them as true. See,, e.g., Moore v. Morris, 475 So.2d 666 (Fla. 1985); Lynch v. Tennyson, 443 So.2d 1017 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); Thompson v. Citizens National Bank of Leesburg, Florida, 433 So.2d 32, 33 (Fla. 5th DCA 1983); O’Connell v. Walt Disney World Company, 413 So.2d 444 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982).

REVERSED.

DAUKSCH and DANIEL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

529 So. 2d 1277, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1985, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 3754, 1988 WL 86871, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rocking-chair-motel-inc-v-federal-deposit-insurance-corp-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack