Rockhold v. State

1 Morr. St. Cas. 188, 5 Howard 291
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1872
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 1 Morr. St. Cas. 188 (Rockhold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rockhold v. State, 1 Morr. St. Cas. 188, 5 Howard 291 (Mich. 1872).

Opinion

TurNer, J.:

These cases come up on writs of error granted by the clerk of the criminal court.

The defendant below, plaintiff in error, was indicted and convicted of the crime of forgery in the criminal court sitting in and for the county of Adams, and sentenced to imprisonment in the penitentiary. He thereupon petitioned the clerk of that court to grant him a writ of error to this court, which was done, and bond and security taken, as in case of appeals from the circuit courts in civil cases, in the penal sum of one hundred dollars, payable to the state, with a condition to prosecute this writ to effect, or in case of failure to pay and satisfy the judgment of this court, together with all such damages, interest, costs, etc.

We are of opinion that these cases must be stricken from the docket, inasmuch as the clerks of courts are not authorized to [189]*189grant writs of error in criminal cases, and can only issue them on the fiat of a judge, or court of competent jurisdiction, for the reasons given in the case of Tuomy v. State, in case of an appeal in state cases.

The act of 1837, How. & Hutch., Code, 541, § 50, is considered as applying to civil cases only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Morr. St. Cas. 188, 5 Howard 291, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockhold-v-state-miss-1872.