Rockhill v. Faerber

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rockhill v. Faerber

272 A.D.2d 930

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 272 A.D.2d 930 (Rockhill v. Faerber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rockhill v. Faerber, 272 A.D.2d 930 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

In a derivative stockholder’s action against directors, order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, or,. in the alternative, to strike out certain numbered paragraphs thereof, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, modified on the law and the facts by striking out the words “ denied in all respects ” and inserting in place thereof the words “ granted to the extent of striking out paragraph 1 Fourteenth ’ of the complaint, and in all other respects denied;”. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order heréon. In our opinion the allegations of paragraph “ Fourteenth ” have no substantial relation to the controversy between the parties, and the motion, as to this paragraph, should have been granted. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a derivative stockholder’s action against directors, order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for insufficiency, or,. in the alternative, to strike out certain numbered paragraphs thereof, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice, modified on the law and the facts by striking out the words “ denied in all respects ” and inserting in place thereof the words “ granted to the extent of striking out paragraph 1 Fourteenth ’ of the complaint, and in all other respects denied;”. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order heréon. In our opinion the allegations of paragraph “ Fourteenth ” have no substantial relation to the controversy between the parties, and the motion, as to this paragraph, should have been granted. Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 A.D.2d 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockhill-v-faerber-nyappdiv-1947.