Rockhart v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Rockhart v. State

158 So. 903, 26 Ala. App. 298, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 33

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 22, 1935

Docket7 Div. 79.

StatusPublished

This text of 158 So. 903 (Rockhart v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rockhart v. State, 158 So. 903, 26 Ala. App. 298, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 33 (Ala. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

*299 BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Prom the record, we ascertain that this appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny and receiving, etc., stolen property knowing that it was stolen and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. The property involved consisted of several articles, including a radio, the property of Charles J. Black. Bach offense was a felony; the amount of the alleged stolen property being in excess of $25.

The record before us contains three charges refused to defendant on the trial of this case. The rulings of the court in this connection are not presented for review, for that there is no bill of exceptions in the record. The record upon which this appeal is rested appears regular in all respects. No error being apparent, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*299 BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

Prom the record, we ascertain that this appellant was convicted of the offense of grand larceny and receiving, etc., stolen property knowing that it was stolen and not having the intent to restore it to the owner. The property involved consisted of several articles, including a radio, the property of Charles J. Black. Bach offense was a felony; the amount of the alleged stolen property being in excess of $25.

The record before us contains three charges refused to defendant on the trial of this case. The rulings of the court in this connection are not presented for review, for that there is no bill of exceptions in the record. The record upon which this appeal is rested appears regular in all respects. No error being apparent, the judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken will stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

158 So. 903, 26 Ala. App. 298, 1935 Ala. App. LEXIS 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockhart-v-state-alactapp-1935.