Rockelle LaShawn Parker v. State
This text of Rockelle LaShawn Parker v. State (Rockelle LaShawn Parker v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-12-00540-CR
Rockelle LaShawn Parker, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 62845, HONORABLE FANCY H. JEZEK, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PER CURIAM
Appellant Rockelle LaShawn Parker has appealed from the district court’s order
revoking her community supervision for the offense of possession of cocaine with intent to deliver.
On December 31, 2012, appellant’s appointed counsel, Mr. W.W. Torrey, filed a motion to
withdraw and for substitution of counsel in light of the commencement of his term of office as
the District Attorney of Milam County effective January 1, 2013. For the reasons explained in
Williamson v. State, No. 03-12-00672-CR, 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 811, at *1-2 (Tex. App.—Austin
Jan. 25, 2013, no pet. h.) (not designated for publication), we abate the appeal and remand the cause
to the district court for consideration of counsel’s motion. If the district court determines that good
cause exists to relieve counsel of his duties and replace him with substitute counsel, the district court
shall permit counsel to withdraw and promptly appoint substitute counsel for the appeal of this cause. A copy of the court’s order appointing substitute counsel and the court’s order granting
counsel’s withdrawal shall be forwarded to this Court no later than March 4, 2013.
Mr. Torrey’s December 31, 2012 motion was also accompanied by a brief concluding
that this appeal is frivolous and without merit. See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). As
a formal matter, this Anders brief has been marked “received,” but not filed, in part because it does
not contain the required certificate of compliance with the newly enacted Rule 9.4, regarding the
length of briefs. See Tex. R. App. P. 9.4(i)(3). Within thirty days of appointment, substitute counsel
shall file an amended brief that remedies this omission and makes such other amendments as
new counsel deems appropriate.
Before Justices Puryear, Pemberton and Rose
Abated
Filed: February 20, 2013
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rockelle LaShawn Parker v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockelle-lashawn-parker-v-state-texapp-2013.