Rockefeller v. Orans

Supreme Court

Rockefeller v. Orans

382 U.S. 10, 86 S. Ct. 75, 15 L. Ed. 2d 13, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 518

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedOctober 11, 1965

Docket319

StatusPublished

Cited by10 cases

This text of 382 U.S. 10 (Rockefeller v. Orans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rockefeller v. Orans, 382 U.S. 10, 86 S. Ct. 75, 15 L. Ed. 2d 13, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 518 (1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On April 14,1965, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that the New York Laws of 1964, cc. 976, 977, 978, 979, 981, were invalid under the New York Constitution, Art. Ill, § 2. On July 13, 1965, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York enjoined interference with an election of members of the New York Legislature to be held on November 2,1965, based on “the scheme set forth” in the New York Laws of 1964, c. 976. Insofar as the decision of the Court of Appeals has been superseded by the order of the District Court, the appeal is dismissed. In all other respects, the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [For concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Harlan, see No. 85, WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, Secretary of State of New York, et al., ante, p. 4.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On April 14,1965, the New York Court of Appeals ruled that the New York Laws of 1964, cc. 976, 977, 978, 979, 981, were invalid under the New York Constitution, Art. Ill, § 2. On July 13, 1965, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York enjoined interference with an election of members of the New York Legislature to be held on November 2,1965, based on “the scheme set forth” in the New York Laws of 1964, c. 976. Insofar as the decision of the Court of Appeals has been superseded by the order of the District Court, the appeal is dismissed. In all other respects, the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Mr. Justice Fortas took no part in the consideration or decision of this case. [For concurring opinion of Mr. Justice Harlan, see No. 85, WMCA, Inc., et al. v. Lomenzo, Secretary of State of New York, et al., ante, p. 4.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

382 U.S. 10, 86 S. Ct. 75, 15 L. Ed. 2d 13, 1965 U.S. LEXIS 518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rockefeller-v-orans-scotus-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack