Rockefeller v. Kellas

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rockefeller v. Kellas

225 A.D. 840

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Rockefeller v. Kellas. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D. 368 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1929·Published

Opinion

Order of December 28,1928, affirmed. Motion for further stay of sale, directed to be made pursuant to the order dated January 7, 1929, denied. The 2d paragraph of said order is modified so as to provide that the referee sell the said stock for cash at public auction to the highest bidder for a sum not less than $400,000 (the amount the respondents stated they would bid on the property at the said sale); said sale to be made subject to the terms and conditions stated in said order, and subject to the ratification, confirmation or rejection by the court as therein provided; and as so modified the order is affirmed. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of December 28,1928, affirmed. Motion for further stay of sale, directed to be made pursuant to the order dated January 7, 1929, denied. The 2d paragraph of said order is modified so as to provide that the referee sell the said stock for cash at public auction to the highest bidder for a sum not less than $400,000 (the amount the respondents stated they would bid on the property at the said sale); said sale to be made subject to the terms and conditions stated in said order, and subject to the ratification, confirmation or rejection by the court as therein provided; and as so modified the order is affirmed. Van Kirk, P. J., Hinman, Davis, Whitmyer and Hill, JJ., concur.

Rockefeller v. Kellas, 225 A.D. 840 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

225 A.D. 840 (Rockefeller v. Kellas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.